You were lucky enough to receive a kidney transplant years ago, but now it is failing. Is it better to opt for another transplant or go on dialysis?
New research suggests a second transplant may be the better option.
Kidney transplants from deceased donors function for a median of 10 to 15 years, which means many don’t last for the rest of the recipient’s life. It has been unclear whether it’s best to get another kidney transplant or be treated with dialysis at that point. However, Blacks tend to have to wait a longer time for kidney transplants than whites.
RELATED: Why African Americans Are Waiting Longer for a Kidney Transplant
What the study shows
To learn more, researchers analyzed data from more than 2,300 adults in Austria whose first transplanted kidney failed and they were put on a waiting list for a second kidney transplant.
Over a 10-year follow-up, patients who received a second kidney transplant lived an average of 5.8 months longer than those who underwent dialysis while remaining on the transplant waiting list.
However, the difference in survival time among re-transplantation patients was slightly lower in those who waited longer for their second kidney transplant.
Compared to those in the dialysis group, re-transplantation patients who received a new kidney within a year lived an average of eight months longer, while those who received a new kidney within eight years lived an average of 0.1 months longer.
The study was published Dec. 27 in the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
“Our data showed that a second transplantation is advantageous regarding gained life years; however, the difference to non-transplanted patients